I'm really looking forward to this dinner, which has a unique theme and menu! It will be in the format of a Jeffersonian Dinner like last month. The topic will be capitalism, health care, and an episode of Black Mirror called "Common People."
For those who haven't seen Black Mirror, I highly recommend it. It's a British anthology television series created by Charlie Brooker. The show features stand-alone episodes, each telling a different story with new characters and settings, often set in near-future dystopias where advanced technology plays a central role. Drawing inspiration from The Twilight Zone, Black Mirror uses speculative fiction to explore the dark, satirical, and sometimes unsettling consequences of modern technology and media on society. Each episode examines how technological advancements can backfire or be used in unexpected ways, tapping into collective anxieties about the digital age. The series is known for its sharp social commentary, suspenseful storytelling, and its ability to provoke thought about the direction in which our world is heading.
Black Mirror has been widely acclaimed for its originality and has won multiple awards, including several Primetime Emmys.
Episode Summary:
Common People," the premiere episode of Black Mirror Season 7, centers on Amanda and Mike, a working-class couple whose lives are upended when Amanda suffers a catastrophic brain injury due to a tumor. Facing the impossibility of recovery through conventional medicine, Mike is approached by a representative from Rivermind, a tech company offering a revolutionary procedure: they can replace Amanda's damaged brain region with a synthetic, cloud-streamed version of her consciousness. The catch is that while the surgery is free, Amanda's continued survival depends on a $300/month subscription, with higher tiers for better quality of life and fewer restrictions.
As Amanda's condition deteriorates and Rivermind introduces more expensive "premium" and "luxury" tiers, Mike is forced to take on extra work and even humiliating, dangerous online gigs to afford the escalating costs. Amanda's quality of life declines sharply: she suffers from intrusive advertisements inserted into her speech, extended periods of sleep, and is geographically tethered by Rivermind's coverage zones. Ultimately, unable to keep up with payments and watching Amanda's humanity slip away, Mike fulfills her wish to end her life when she is no longer "there," leading to a tragic conclusion.
Below are discussion questions designed to spark conversation among participants of all backgrounds. The questions draw on the episode’s themes and incorporate perspectives—including those of free market thinkers—about competition, innovation, and the role of patents in healthcare. Each question is open-ended and accessible, encouraging everyone to share their views regardless of expertise.
General Questions on the Episode and Healthcare
What emotions did you feel watching Mike and Amanda's struggle with Rivermind’s ever-increasing costs? Did anything feel familiar or exaggerated compared to real-world healthcare experiences?
In the episode, the company offers a life-saving treatment as a subscription service with escalating fees and new restrictions. Do you think this is a fair metaphor for how some healthcare or tech services work today? Why or why not?
Capitalism, Competition, and Innovation
The episode shows a single company (Rivermind) with total control over a life-saving technology. In a real free market, do you think other companies would step in to offer better or cheaper alternatives? What might prevent that from happening?
What are some ways that competition can help lower healthcare costs or improve quality? Can you think of examples where competition has made things better—or worse—in healthcare or other industries?
If you could design a healthcare system from scratch, how would you balance the need for innovation (new treatments and technology) with the need for affordability and access?
Patents, Monopolies, and Barriers to Entry
Rivermind claims to be the only company able to offer this treatment. What do you think might allow a company to have such exclusive control—patents, regulations, or something else? Is this a good or bad thing for patients?
Patents are designed to reward innovation by giving inventors exclusive rights for a period of time. Do you think this system works well in healthcare, or does it create problems like high prices and limited access?
If there were no patents or fewer barriers to entry, do you think Mike and Amanda would have had more choices or lower costs? Why or why not?
Ethics, Access, and Human Dignity
The episode raises the question: Should access to life-saving care depend on your ability to pay? What are the pros and cons of a system where healthcare is treated like any other product or service?
How do you feel about the idea of companies inserting ads or restricting features in exchange for lower prices on essential services like healthcare? Where should we draw the line between business models and human dignity?
What responsibilities, if any, do companies have to ensure that their innovations are accessible to everyone, not just those who can pay the most?
Free Market and Libertarian Perspectives
Free market thinkers argue that competition and consumer choice would prevent the kind of exploitation seen in the episode. Do you agree or disagree? What might get in the way of true competition in healthcare?
Some believe that government regulations and patents create artificial monopolies, leading to higher prices and fewer choices. Others argue these protections are necessary for innovation. Where do you stand?
If you were Mike, would you have made different choices to try to find alternatives, or do you think the system left him with “no choice”? What could have changed that?
Closing Reflection
What is one thing you would change about the current healthcare system to make it more just, affordable, or innovative?
After watching "Common People," do you feel more hopeful or more concerned about the future of healthcare and technology?
These questions are designed to invite a wide range of perspectives and encourage thoughtful, inclusive conversation—no expertise required.
Flock & Forage Photos
Chef Samantha DeMichael
My name is Sammy, I am the owner and chef of Flock & Forage. My supper club focuses on market-driven ingredients and the awareness of where your food comes from. I am inspired by the farmers and sustainable ingredients that are available to us in the Midwest. Working closely with Green City Market and local farmers for the past 9 years has been my true inspiration and what really ignited my passion for finding ways to cook with only local ingredients from our region. Nothing brings me more joy than hosting an intimate dinner and knowing the importance of what's on your plate. My seasonal, rotating menus are simple, yet sophisticated, highlighting the best each season has to offer!
There will also be biodynamic wine from Oakwood Vines, vodka from Broda, and blueberry basil kombucha, French rhubard pie (ingredients: organic Einkorn wheat flour, pastured pork lard, water, pastured eggs, baking soda, real salt, rhubarb, organic maple sugar, raw honey, and organic vanilla extract), chocolate chip cookies (ingredients: organic unbleached pastry flour, organic sugar, organic butter, organic eggs, chocolate chips, organic whole wheat pastry flour, rapadura sugar, baking soda, unrefined salt), and fudge from Pleasant Pastures, a farm in Pennsylvania.
Oakwood Vines
Oakwood Vines from Lake Forest, IL represents the Boisset Collection of wineries located in Napa Valley, Sonoma, & Burgundy. The Boisset wineries are one of the most highly awarded & sustainable family owned wineries in the world. Thousands of wines rated over 90 points from hundreds of sustainably farmed vineyards.
Sixty centuries of shared winemaking heritage across our twenty-five iconic wine destinations in France and California. The Boisset family has long recognized the strong resemblance between the terroir of Burgundy and that of Sonoma County and the incredible potential to grow world-class, terroir-driven wines throughout the region.
Boisset leads by example in California with the most certified and organic and biodynamic acres in Napa Valley. Boisset has 191 total acres certified of sustainable wine growing in Napa and Sonoma.
Boisset Collection’s French & California wines:
The Boisset family has long recognized the strong resemblance between the terroir of Burgundy and that of Sonoma County and the incredible potential to grow wines throughout the region.
As an example Boisset’s DeLoach Vineyards showed the world that the terroir of Sonoma County, combined with traditional family’s Burgundian winemaking techniques can create truly spectacular wines. Boisset’s expanded portfolio of California wine illustrates the different varietals and styles that derive from the unique terroirs of Sonoma County, Napa Valley and beyond.
These gatherings focus on the principles of meaningful and unconditional giving that are thoughtfully articulated in Meaningful Business Connections by Morrie Elstien, The Go-Giver by Bob Burg and John David Mann, Give and Take by Adam Grant, and The NCG Factor: A Formula for Building Life-Changing Relationships from College to Retirement by Larry Kaufman.
"Some people, when they do someone a favor, are always looking for a chance to call it in. And some aren't, but they're still aware of it - still regard it as a debt. But other don't even do that. They're like a vine that produces grapes without looking for anything in return. A horse at the end of the race... A dog when the hunt is over... A bee with its honey stored... And a human being after helping others. They don't make a fuss about it. They just go on to something else, as the vine looks forward to bearing fruit again in season. We should be like that. Acting almost unconsciously."